What do you do when things get hard?


When network engineering gets hard (and it always does), most engineers retreat into one of two worlds

Naive Optimism: The world where you tell yourself “AI won’t affect my role,” where every automation trend is overhyped and where the future feels safe because the past felt familiar. This mindset avoids the uncomfortable truth and clings to blind confidence.

Hopeless Realism: The world where every advancement in AI feels like a threat, where every new automation tool signals your eventual replacement, where you face the facts but lose hope in your ability to adapt. Engineers in this group freeze, panic, or quietly disengage.

But the people who thrive in this new era are the ones who grow stronger as AI reshapes the industry. They don’t live in either extreme. They operate at the collision of those two worlds.

They blend Naive Optimism and Hopeless Realism into something far more powerful: practical, resilient, reality-based confidence.

This mindset has a name: The Stockdale Paradox.

And it’s exactly the mindset engineers need right now.

Just like Admiral Stockdale, who survived because he held two truths at once, engineers must do the same:

Never lose faith in your long-term ability to adapt, evolve, and thrive and at the same time ruthlessly confront the brutal reality that your role is changing faster than ever.

The Engineer’s Stockdale Paradox

  1. An unwavering belief that you will remain relevant because you can learn, adapt, and reinvent yourself.
  2. A clear-eyed acceptance that AI is changing the field; the tasks, the expectations, the skills, the pace.

The first keeps you hopeful, curious, and open to transformation. The second keeps you honest, focused, and prepared for what’s coming.

You need both to survive a career shaped by AI and to grow because of it.

If you can look directly at the uncomfortable realities of the modern networking world; automation taking over ticket work, AI diagnosing issues, LLMs assisting configs and still believe you can carve out a future in this new landscape.

You become unbeatable.

The engineers who thrive in the AI era aren’t the ones who deny what’s happening. And they aren’t the ones who collapse under fear.

They’re the ones who hold the paradox:

See the truth clearly. Believe in yourself anyway.

The Modern Engineer

Join 1k+ other forward-thinking professionals who receive the weekly newsletter, where I provide actionable strategies, insights and tools to escape the grind and build influential, future-proof careers. Sign up and I will send yoy a FREE copy of my 5-Stage playbook to multiply your impact and build a career that AI can't replace.

Read more from The Modern Engineer

Hello Reader, A few years ago, I proposed adding automated rollback capabilities to our deployment pipeline. The system was fragile—on-call rotations were painful, incidents were frequent, and small changes could break the entire workflow. The refactor wouldn't ship new features, but it would make everything more reliable six months from now. The response was polite: "Sounds sensible. Not right now. Let's revisit next quarter." Next quarter came with new deadlines, new priorities and other...

Hello Reader, A few months ago, I spoke with an engineer who described a design review he could not stop thinking about. It was a standard meeting. A dozen people on the call, a couple of senior voices leading the conversation and a solution that already felt decided before anyone joined. Halfway through, he noticed a scaling issue that would only show up during edge cases. He thought about bringing it up then he looked at the room. A senior engineer had already said it looked good. The...

Hello Reader, I spoke with an old friend last week. He told me he spent 4 years as a senior engineer watching less experienced engineers get to the next level ahead of him. His designs were cleaner. His solutions were faster. His technical reviews were thorough. But he kept getting the same feedback: "You need to be more visible and strategic" He thought that meant talking more in meetings. He was wrong. What he lacked was influence at work The Real Problem Here’s what actually happens when...